Book a demo
Menu
Units, elements, PCs and trainer currency as first-class concepts

Software that speaks VET, not generic e-learning

The most common complaint about LMS vendors in RTO groups is blunt: they do not understand the RTO space. Here, a unit of competency is a real object pulled from training.gov.au, elements, performance criteria, knowledge and performance evidence attached, and everything you author maps back to it.

Start free trialBook a demo

7-day trial, no card needed.

Tools that treat VET like corporate e-learning

A generic LMS thinks a course is a playlist of videos with a quiz at the end. An RTO knows a course is units of competency with evidence requirements, trainer credentials behind every judgement, and an auditor who will read all of it.

No concept of a unit of competency: If the platform cannot tell you which questions evidence which performance criteria, your mapping lives in a spreadsheet on the side, and drifts.

Trainers left to fight the tool: Systems trainers cannot stop breaking are systems designed for software people, not for a carpenter who became a trainer at 50.

Compliance bolted on after: When AVETMISS and evidence trails are afterthoughts, every audit becomes an archaeology project.

VET-native features

Things a generic LMS has no word for

training.gov.au integrationImport qualifications and units with full competency detail, and re-pull when a training package updates.
Question-to-PC mappingEvery assessment question maps to the elements, PCs, KE and PE it evidences, with coverage checking at publish.
Trainer matrixTAE qualifications, vocational competency, industry currency, first aid and WWCC tracked per trainer, the matrix an auditor asks for first.
Assessment declarationsMarking is gated behind trainer declarations, with credential snapshots taken at the moment of judgement.
Real assessment varietyWritten, auto-marked question shapes, observation, viva, third-party reports, file evidence, plus SCORM 1.2 upload and a gamified course builder.
USI and AVETMISS nativeUSI verification wired to certificate issuance; all NAT files generated and validated in-platform.
How VET-first works

From training.gov.au to audit-ready, in one line

The platform is organised the way an RTO actually is: units at the bottom, courses assembling them, deliveries selling them, students enrolled into deliveries.

  1. 1Pull units from training.gov.auImport a qualification and its units arrive with elements, performance criteria, knowledge evidence and performance evidence attached, no re-typing the training package.
  2. 2Author against the unitLearner guides and assessments are written with the elements and PCs on screen, and every question maps to the codes it evidences. Coverage gaps surface before publish, not at audit.
  3. 3Deliver and mark with the evidence trail built inWritten, observation, viva and third-party evidence, marked by trainers whose qualifications and currency are on file and snapshotted into every assessment declaration.
  4. 4Report from the same dataAVETMISS NAT files generate and validate from live delivery data. Outcomes trace back to units, questions, and marked evidence.

Quick answers.

Is this actually built for RTOs, or relabelled corporate e-learning?

Built for RTOs from the schema up. Units of competency, variants of delivery, funding sources, USI verification and AVETMISS NAT files are database-level concepts here, not labels on generic objects.

Will my trainers cope with it?

The design test we apply to every screen is a 55-year-old tradesperson who became a trainer: big obvious buttons, plain English, no dead ends, and no jargon. If a screen fails that test, we rebuild it.

Does the AI mark assessments?

No. AI helps trainers author questions and suggests PC/KE/PE mappings, which the trainer accepts or adjusts. Competency judgements are made and declared by qualified trainers, the system snapshots their credentials into every declaration.

Can I see mapping coverage per unit?

Yes, every question carries the codes it evidences, and gaps (a KE with no question mapping to it) surface before you publish, not at audit.

What about the 2025 Standards?

The evidence and governance trail, declarations, credential snapshots, append-only audit logs, role-based access, is designed for the outcomes the revised Standards look for. Your compliance judgement stays with your CEO and compliance team; the system keeps the records.

What does it cost?

Published pricing on every plan, with AVETMISS included on all of them. Every number is on the pricing page.

Bring a unit you actually deliver

Book a demo and name a unit you deliver, we will import it from training.gov.au live and author a mapped question against it while you watch.

Start free trialBook a demo

AVETMISS™ is a trademark of NCVER. RTO Grow is an independent software provider, not affiliated with or endorsed by NCVER or ASQA.